WEF Launches Coalition to Reward People with ‘Carbon Credits’ for Using Less Resources

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has launched a new digital currency space named, ‘The Crypto Sustainability Coalition,’ which they say will reward groups taking action against ‘climate change.’

The coalition, consisting of 30 different groups, merged to leverage Web3 tech, cryptocurrencies, and blockchain, which will help the world become carbon neutral, they claim.

The WEF writes on its official website:

The coalition launch is timely as there is an urgent need to support the decarbonization of cryptocurrency and ensuring the industry is part of the climate solution. Furthermore, there needs to be regulatory clarity that promotes web3 innovation, protects consumers, and improves financial inclusion.

“I am excited about the work we are expecting from the Crypto Sustainability Coalition,” Brynly Llyr, Head of Blockchain and Digital Assets, World Economic Forum, said.

“An important and unique aspect of web3 is that it uses technology to support and reward direct community engagement and action. This means we can coordinate the work of many individuals directly with one another, enabling collective action without centralized control – a powerful accelerator for grass roots action.”

The coalition will examine how to add “carbon credits” to the blockchain.

Here are some of the list of partners:

• The Crypto Council for Innovation
• Rainforest Partnership
• The Sustainable Bitcoin Standard
• Zero Labs

The ‘Great Reset’

The WEF has been bold about its ‘great reset’ agenda as global elites sprints towards their finish line of total global enslavement.

RELATED: World Economic Forum: ‘Solid, Rational’ Reasons to Microchip Children

WEF speaker and Norwegian Finance CEO Kjerstin Braathen said people should be prepared for “pain” and “energy shortages” under the transition to the WEF’s climate change agenda.

“We need to accept that there will be some pain in the process,” Braathen said.

“The pace that we need [to end climate change] will open up for missteps. It will open up for shortages of energy. It will create inflationary pressures, and maybe we need to start talking about that — that pain is actually worth it.”

“Because if we don’t, there’s no business case; there’s no economy; there’s no welfare. But so far, I think we have been a little bit careful actually talking about the pain in the short term that is likely to come from this very important change,” Braathen said.

King Charles III and the WEF

Even King Charles, who is a proud member of the WEF, is actively and publicly advocating the “great reset.”

This is what King Charles said at the launch of the WEF’s ‘Great Reset’ event in 2020:

“There is a golden opportunity to seize something good from this crisis…global crises know no borders, and highlight how interdependent we are as one people sharing one planet.”

“Unless we take the action necessary, and build in a greener and more inclusive and sustainable way, then we will have more and more pandemics.”

It’s not just the move to the digital currency or cashless society that is cause for concern; it’s the vast list of ‘luxuries’ we once took for granted that the WEF wants to make a thing of the past: These include an end to owning private property, end of car ownership, an end to eating meat, and even the sun.

In line with Bill Gates’ plan to block out the sun, a WEF video explains how scientists can use ‘space bubbles’ “could help reverse climate change” by “reflecting the Sun’s heat away from Earth.”

Here is what the WEF writes on its website:

Architect Carlo Ratti is among a group of MIT researchers exploring the feasibility of fighting climate change with a conglomeration of “space bubbles” that would float above the Earth to reflect the sun’s rays.

The Space Bubbles research project proposes floating a “raft” made of frozen bubbles at the L1 Lagrangian Point – the point between the Earth and the sun where their gravitational pulls cancel out.

The bubbles would be made of a thin-film material and manufactured in space where, when interconnected, they would cover an area roughly the size of Brazil.

“Geoengineering might be our final and only option,” said Ratti, who is the head of MIT’s Senseable City Lab. “Yet, most geoengineering proposals are earth-bound, which poses tremendous risks to our living ecosystem.”

“Space-based solutions would be safer – for instance, if we deflect 1.8 percent of incident solar radiation before it hits our planet, we could fully reverse today’s global warming.”

The WEF even acknowledges that geoengineering is controversial but added that the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said it is a necessary Plan B if temperature rises can’t be capped.